Enslaved to an Image

Pornography, the Brain, and the Pastoral Responsibility of the Church

“I was held fast, not in fetters clamped upon me by another, but by my own will, which had the strength of iron chains. The enemy held my will in his power and from it he had made a chain and shackled me. For my will was perverse and lust had grown from it, and when I gave in to lust habit was born, and when I did not resist the habit it became a necessity.”

—Augustine, Confessions 8.5

Abstract

Pornography has become the defining sexual pathology of contemporary Western culture, and its presence within the church is not peripheral. Drawing on Heath Lambert, R. Albert Mohler Jr., John Piper, William R. Cutrer, Andrew David Naselli, and Wayne Grudem, this essay develops an integrated account of pornography’s nature, mechanism, and moral weight from confessional evangelical and Reformed perspectives. It argues that pornography is not a behavioral problem susceptible to management techniques. It is a complex of idolatrous desires rooted in the disordering of the human heart, amplified by neurological habituation, and capable of dismantling marriages, ministries, and souls with quiet efficiency. The essay proceeds in seven movements: the scope and cultural normalization of pornography; its biblical foundations; its neuroscientific mechanisms and addictive architecture; its biblical-theological diagnosis as a compound perversion of sexuality; the harms it produces across multiple registers, including its participation in sex slavery; and the pastoral-ecclesial response the church is obligated to mount. Throughout, the argument resists both moralistic reductionism, which treats the problem as manageable behavior, and therapeutic evasion, which dissolves moral culpability into victimhood. Grace, rightly understood, is more powerful than the pathology.

Keywords: pornography; sexual ethics; neuroscience; sanctification; biblical counseling; pastoral theology; addiction; idolatry; sex slavery; imago Dei

1. The Scope of the Problem

Pornography is the defining sexual sin of our day. Heath Lambert says so without hedging, and the claim carries the weight of pastoral observation rather than academic posture. In a single year he counseled six people struggling with homosexuality, around eighteen caught in adultery or fornication, and dozens locked in pornographic consumption. The dozens, he notes, are not the ones who trouble him most. The ones who trouble him are the ones who never came.[1]

That asymmetry is worth sitting with. The visible cases are the tractable ones. The hidden cases surface only when catastrophe forces disclosure, and by then the damage is years deep. A counselor’s caseload, on Lambert’s reckoning, understates the problem by an order of magnitude.

A word on what is meant here. To indulge in pornography, in Naselli’s working definition, is to sinfully allow oneself to enjoy the pleasure of printed or visual material that explicitly describes or displays sexual body parts or activity in order to stimulate erotic feelings.[2] Philosophers have found the term notoriously hard to pin down; Michael Rea has argued that pornography is not an intrinsic property of any object but a matter of how material is reasonably expected to be used or treated by its intended audience.[3] The standard reference works land in roughly the same place from a different angle: what marks pornography is not the degree of explicitness, since serious art can be explicit without debasing, but the pairing of sexual content with dehumanizing or exploitative ends.[4] The working definition is sufficient for the pastoral question, which is not metaphysical but moral.

1.1 Cultural Saturation

Mohler describes the saturation directly. Sexual imagery has migrated into advertising, marketing, and nearly every corner of American life, until what he calls ambient pornography turns up everywhere from the shopping mall to prime-time television.[5] By some estimates the production and sale of explicit material now ranks among the largest industries in the country, with new videos and pages generated weekly and every fresh digital platform serving as one more distribution channel.

Cutrer sharpens the picture from a physician’s vantage. Pornography is cheap, instantly available, and wrapped in a false sense of anonymity.[6] Piper puts the scale in relief: against roughly 1.9 million cocaine users and 2 million heroin users in the United States, he counts some 40 million regular consumers of online pornography.[7] No pastoral strategy that takes sexual sin seriously can file pornography under secondary or specialized concerns.

1.2 The Evolution of Pornography: From Margin to Mainstream

Mohler’s 2015 essay “Fifty Shades of Shame” tracks a shift. He reads the release of the Fifty Shades of Grey film, timed for Valentine’s Day, as “nothing less than the evolution of pornography in an age increasingly distant from a biblical vision of sexuality and human dignity.”[8] What had long been a predominantly male, visual market was now openly courting women through narrative.

The series, Mohler argues, signaled that the wider culture was ready to embrace as mainstream a plotline organized around forms of sexuality once classed as perverse and abusive.[9] Marketed to couples and celebrated in theaters, the film exemplified what Daniel Patrick Moynihan called defining deviancy down. The lost sense of shame registers not only in the book sales but in the public applause for the movie. This stage fuses the two delivery systems that had developed separately, male-oriented visual pornography and female-oriented narrative pornography, into a single cultural product.

What makes Mohler’s analysis theologically useful is where he locates the critique. Not in aesthetics or sociology, but in the unity of the transcendentals. Christianity holds that the good, the beautiful, and the true are one in God himself.[10] Pornography tries to wrest beauty away from goodness and truth, which is not merely an aesthetic failure. It is defiance of the structure of reality.

1.3 Presence Within the Church

Cutrer’s figures for the Christian community are sobering. Surveys he cites suggest that half of Christian men and a fifth of Christian women are addicted to pornography, and that many church leaders, along with a still higher share of members, have visited sexually explicit sites within the previous year.[11] Men, and increasingly women, trade marriages, ministries, reputations, and testimonies for a fleeting stimulation.

What makes these numbers uniquely corrosive to the church is the marriage of accessibility and concealment. A man can sit in the front pew with his family and carry a habit of years that no one suspects. The distance between Sunday performance and weekday reality can be held open indefinitely. The harm done in that interval, to his own soul and to the marriage he is quietly abandoning, does not show up in any survey.

1.4 The Church’s Silence as Complicity

Lambert’s sharpest observation is not about the men who struggle. It is about the church that does not help. The best books and articles see clearly how prevalent and poisonous pornography is, and they say so at length. What they rarely supply is a practical strategy. A leader can describe the problem with precision and still have no idea how to help a particular man lay hold of grace and get free.[12]

That gap between diagnosis and competence is the failure point. When the church names the sin again and again without equipping anyone to fight it, it teaches something devastating by implication: that this sin is uniquely hopeless, that grace does not reach this far, that the right response is private shame. A man already drowning in guilt does not need another announcement that he should not be drowning. He needs someone to show him how to swim.

2. The Biblical Foundation

A serious treatment of pornography has to begin with what Scripture says, not with what Christian consensus assumes. Grudem’s analysis in Christian Ethics supplies a framework that runs from the Decalogue through the Prophets into the teaching of Jesus.

2.1 The Tenth Commandment and the Heart

The moral architecture of the Decalogue already anticipates pornography’s logic. The prohibition against coveting a neighbor’s wife (Ex. 20:17), Grudem observes, is a command not to desire to have her as one’s own.[13] Proverbs 6:25 makes the point explicit: “Do not desire her beauty in your heart.” God’s standard reaches past the act to the orientation of desire from which the act flows.

Pornography therefore stands condemned by the law of Moses on its own terms, before one reaches the New Testament. A man who views pornographic images for the sake of arousal is doing exactly what the tenth commandment forbids, desiring a woman who is not his wife. That the desire is mediated by a screen rather than a glance across a field does not alter the structure of the act.

2.2 Ezekiel’s Progression

One of the more striking witnesses on this subject is Ezekiel 23:14–17, where the prophet figures Jerusalem as a woman named Oholibah. Grudem draws attention to the progression Ezekiel traces:[14]

She saw men portrayed on the wall, the images of the Chaldeans portrayed in vermilion, wearing belts on their waists, with flowing turbans on their heads, all of them having the appearance of officers. When she saw them, she lusted after them and sent messengers to them in Chaldea. And the Babylonians came to her into the bed of love, and they defiled her with their whoring lust. (Ezek. 23:14–17)

She saw, then she lusted, then she sent for the men she had seen pictured, and finally she acted. Ezekiel maps, with some precision, the sequence that pornography research would later describe in neurological terms. Visual stimulation generates craving; craving generates pursuit; pursuit generates action. The prophet understood the mechanism centuries before anyone named it.

2.3 The Sermon on the Mount

Jesus brings the Old Testament teaching on purity to its sharpest point in Matthew 5:27–28: “You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall not commit adultery.’ But I say to you that everyone who looks at a woman with lustful intent has already committed adultery with her in his heart.” The Greek pros to epithymēsai marks the purpose of the looking; the issue is not the incidental glance but the intentional gaze.[15] The question pornography forces is not whether the man felt aroused but whether arousal was the point of looking. If it was, the adultery of the heart is already done.

Piper adds a complementary note. Jesus saw, with the clarity of a designer inspecting his own invention, that the physical eye works profound effects on the spiritual heart, and that the traffic runs both ways. The neurological research on pornography’s rewiring of the brain is not foreign to biblical anthropology. It specifies what Scripture already knows about the relation of body and soul.

2.4 Rationalizations and Their Failure

Grudem catalogs the rationalizations pornography users deploy, and the biblical answers are worth summarizing. To “it is only a picture, not a real woman,” the reply is that it is a picture of a real woman, viewed for the purpose of arousal, which Jesus calls adultery in the heart. To “I am merely curious, not lusting,” the reply is a question: are you sexually aroused by what you are looking at? To “it is only soft pornography,” the reply is the same test of purpose.[16]

The rationalizations share one structure. Each tries to pry the act apart from its purpose, the look from the lust, the image from the desire. Scripture refuses the separation. The moral question is whether it is right to create, acquire, and view images for the primary purpose of arousing desires that run against God’s standard. Framed that way, the answer is not in doubt.

2.5 The Body as Temple

Naselli adds a register the heart-and-desire argument can leave implicit: the body itself. Reading 1 Corinthians 6, he presses Paul’s claim that the Christian’s body belongs to God by purchase and houses the Spirit by gift.[17]

Flee from sexual immorality. Every other sin a person commits is outside the body, but the sexually immoral person sins against his own body. Or do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit within you, whom you have from God? You are not your own, for you were bought with a price. So glorify God in your body. (1 Cor. 6:18–20)

Paul’s immediate target was men in Corinth who treated sex with prostitutes as morally indifferent, but the logic reaches any immoral sex, pornography included. The argument is not chiefly about consequences. It is about ownership and sanctity. The body that indulges is a temple, sacred space, the dwelling of the Spirit, and it is not the man’s own to spend.[18] One way to compress Paul’s case: glorify God with your body by refusing what defiles it. Pornography does not glorify God with the body; it desecrates the holy place.

3. How Pornography Works: The Neuroscientific Architecture

Understanding pornography as a pastoral problem requires understanding it as a neurological one. The two accounts do not compete. They converge. William Struthers of Wheaton College, a psychologist trained in neuroscience, argues that men are wired such that pornography hijacks the proper functioning of their brains, with lasting effects on thought and life.[19] Mohler leans on Struthers at length, careful to note that the research does nothing to reduce moral culpability even as it explains how the habit takes hold.

3.1 The Neurological Mechanism

Pornography is not a neutral stimulus. Struthers’ description is clinical and pastorally pointed at once: looking at pornography is nothing like looking at a black-and-white photograph of the Lincoln Memorial; men are reflexively drawn to the content. And the content promises more than arousal. It is, in Struthers’ phrase, “a whispered promise,” offering “more sex, better sex, endless sex, sex on demand, more intense orgasms, experiences of transcendence.”[20]

The mechanism Piper summarizes from Morgan Bennett’s research explains why that promise breeds habituated craving rather than rest. Cocaine drives dopamine, the neurotransmitter of the addictive high; heroin works as an opiate with a relaxing effect; both produce tolerance, demanding escalating doses for the same intensity.

3.1.1 The Polydrug Effect

Pornography, Piper explains after Bennett, both arouses and releases. It triggers the dopamine high and the opiate calm of orgasm in one event, firing both classes of addictive brain chemistry at once, which is why it is, in their phrase, a kind of polydrug.[21] Worse than chemical addiction in one respect: a substance can be metabolized out of the body, but a pornographic image cannot be metabolized out of the brain, because it is filed in memory.[22]

Piper’s forest metaphor names the structural result. The brain is a forest, and repeated viewing is a hiker wearing the same trail deeper day after day, until the well-paved path becomes the default route through which all sexual stimulation runs.[23] Without intending to, the user has built a circuit that makes pornographic categories the filter for sexual reality.

3.1.2 Escalation and Distortion

Tolerance does not hold steady. The same dose, repeated, demands a larger one, and in pornography the larger dose takes the form of more novel and more extreme content, including more taboo acts and material involving violence or the abuse of minors. The superhighway Struthers describes has many on-ramps and few exits.

Cutrer’s medical description reinforces the point. Struthers likens repeated exposure to rainwater carving a hillside, each pass deepening the channel, until the erosion is written into the brain’s anatomy.[24] After that, any stimulating image, a picture, a film, a coworker, sends the brain straight to the locus of arousal, and the neurochemical response makes it steadily harder to see other people as persons made in God’s image.

3.2 Sexual Addiction and Its Limits as a Category

Cutrer grants that the literature has settled on addictive language, while noting that from a medical standpoint the condition resembles obsessive-compulsive behavior more than chemical dependency in one respect: the long-term pornography user does not suffer the dramatic physical withdrawal that marks alcohol or narcotic addiction, even as his brain undergoes real change, including an endorphin response with a narcotic-like effect.[25]

The framework earns its keep not by medicating the condition but by naming the progression, and by warning the man who thinks his use is casual and controlled that he is likely several steps nearer compulsion than he knows.

3.3 The Question of Culpability

The neurological account does not dissolve responsibility. It deepens the pastoral problem. Mohler insists that Struthers’ research does nothing to reduce the moral culpability of those who consume pornography. The addict is responsible for his addiction.[26]

This is not a throwaway caveat. Therapeutic Christianity has been eager to relocate moral failure in biology, which makes the neurological account a tool for evasion as readily as a tool for clarity. The right way through the disease-versus-sin impasse was charted by Cornelius Plantinga: we must reject both the typically judgmental and the typically permissive accounts of the relation between sin and addiction, saying neither that all addiction is simple sin nor that it is inculpable disease.[27] Kent Dunnington presses the same point further. Addiction is a habit so entrenched it functions as a second nature, and it thrives in a culture of boredom and idle time because it offers a consuming engagement that lifts the addict out of the fragmented, humdrum realities of ordinary life.[28] That is escapism with a neurochemical engine, and it is finally a form of worship. The addict, Dunnington writes, will do anything for his idol, including die for it.[29]

Understanding the neuroscience sharpens rather than softens the pastoral task. It explains why the man who genuinely wants to stop often cannot stop on his own. The sincerity of his desire to change is real; so is the insufficiency of willpower. He is not exonerated by the literature. He is owed a realistic account of what repentance and recovery will actually require, which is a good deal more than a firm intention and a better internet filter.

4. Biblical-Theological Diagnosis: The Heart Behind the Habit

The mechanism is necessary to understand and insufficient by itself. The church needs an account that reaches beneath the brain to the desires that generate the behavior. Lambert’s contribution here is the sharpest available. Misidentify the problem, he argues, and you will misdirect the help; a needs-based therapeutic framework distorts both the diagnosis and the cure.

4.1 The Inadequacy of Needs-Based Frameworks

Lambert takes Michael John Cusick’s Surfing for God as a representative case. On Cusick’s reading, men pursue pornography out of broken woundedness, unmet needs for love, significance, and security; they are lonely, looking for relationship rather than sex.[30]

Lambert raises three objections. First, the account misidentifies the problem. Many of the men he has counseled are married to women who love them and have pursued them for months or years, even as the husbands turned away toward images on a screen.[31] There is no reliable path from loneliness to pornography, and routing the behavior through unmet needs steers accountability away from sin.

Second, the needs-based account renders men passive in their sin. In fact the men who pursue pornographic images are actively corrupt; they go looking, hunting out image after image to consume.[32] A picture of leaky containers waiting to be filled cannot account for the moral agency that repentance assumes.

Third, the passivity Cusick commends slides toward effeminacy. Biblical manhood, as Lambert reads it, is a summons to active engagement with God and others, not a retreat into tears. Scripture casts the struggle against sexual sin as warfare: “Beloved, I urge you as aliens and strangers to abstain from fleshly lusts, which wage war against the soul” (1 Pet. 2:11). Men are called to run into the fire and fight with the grace of Jesus. Withdrawing to a closet to weep is not a strategy the New Testament recognizes or even allows for.[33]

4.2 The Seven Perverse Desires

Lambert’s constructive account names seven distinct perverse desires that drive men to pornography. Knowing each one equips a pastor to address the particular idolatry in front of him rather than issue a generic appeal to purity.[34]

4.2.1 Lust

The first and most basic is lust in the precise biblical sense, which Lambert defines as greedy desire for what does not belong to you. Sexual lust is greedy desire for intercourse with a woman who is not one’s wife. Its opposite is thankfulness for what the Lord has given (Eph. 5:3–4). The man enslaved to pornography has stopped believing that God will supply what he truly needs, and so he grasps for more.[35]

4.2.2 Promiscuity

Men who seek pornographic images want many partners rather than one. The qualification for eldership in 1 Timothy 3:2 requires a man to be, literally, a one-woman man. Monogamy is a theological marker, not a cultural convention. Pornography expresses dissatisfaction with the singularity of marital sex and reaches instead for what Lambert calls a pornographic harem.[36]

4.2.3 Anonymity

Pornography trades in anonymous sex. The women on the screen do not know the man watching, and the not-knowing is the appeal: he can look without risking the rejection that comes with being known.[37] Scripture’s word for sexual union is knowing (Gen. 4:1), not from prudishness but to mark the intimacy that belongs to sex by design. Pornography strips that intimacy away by definition.

4.2.4 Brevity

God’s design for marriage begins in youth and runs to death, a relationship with one woman sustained across the whole arc of a shared life. A pornographic encounter begins when desire wakes and ends when it is sated; the parties share nothing else and are finished with each other in moments.[38] It is the precise inversion of covenant.

4.2.5 Shallowness

Lambert writes that in a healthy marriage “sex is a blossom that flourishes on a well-cultivated plant.”[39] Married men are called to desire wives who carry sorrow, lose their tempers, worry about the children, and bristle at a careless joke, and in most real relationships those things have to be tended before sex is enjoyed. The woman in pornography has no such complications, at least as far as the consumer is concerned. She seems eager to please him, and he lets her; when he closes the screen, every other obligation evaporates. This is the opposite of loving a wife as Christ loved the church.

4.2.6 Youth

Pornography fixes desire on youth rather than on seasoned commitment. The industry has no use for aging women, and its consumers absorb that preference. The God of Scripture commands the reverse: “Rejoice in the wife of your youth” (Prov. 5:18–19), where the phrase encourages a man to desire his wife throughout life, whether the couple is newly married or old.[40] Pornography is built as a rebellion against that design.

4.2.7 Passivity

Sex in marriage is work. It takes courage to pursue a wife who is not in the mood and patience to make sure she enjoys the encounter as much as her husband does. Pornography asks for none of it. There is no pursuit, no risk of refusal, no call to serve another person; all the man has to do is sit, watch, and enjoy.[41] It is the laziness of lust institutionalized. Lambert’s summary is exact: men look at pornography out of ungrateful lust for anonymous, fleeting, frivolous, easy sex with numerous women.

4.3 Pornography as Idolatry

Cutrer’s diagnosis converges with Lambert’s moral anatomy but frames it as idolatry. He defines sexual lust as the overpowering desire to possess something that substitutes for God and his love, and anything that takes that kind of primacy in a life is an idol.[42] John’s warning applies directly: the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life are not from the Father but from the world (1 John 2:16). Pornography engages all three at once, the flesh in illicit desire, the eyes in arousal apart from covenant, and pride in the choice to set one’s own will above God’s expressed command.

Sin lies at the root of pornographic addiction, and the sin is idolatry. No amount of neurological insight changes that. Understanding the biology clarifies what the sinner is contending with when he repents; it does not relocate the responsibility.

4.4 Pornography’s Effect on the Image of God

Drawing on Struthers, Cutrer makes a point that belongs in every serious treatment of the subject: repeated exposure and the objectification it trains “changes the way our brains see each other,” so that pornography “dishonors the image of God in an individual by treating him or her as a sexual object to be consumed directly or indirectly.”[43]

The man entrenched in pornography progressively cannot see the person in front of him. He sees an occasion for gratification. This is the systematic suppression of the imago Dei in his perception of other people; the neighbor whom Christ loved and bought at infinite cost is reduced to a stimulus category. Mohler frames it precisely in the Fifty Shades essay: to declare beauty at the expense of goodness and truth is an assault on the dignity every human being possesses simply by being made in God’s image.[44]

5. The Harm Taxonomy

The harms of pornography are not confined to the spiritual register, though they begin there. Grudem’s Christian Ethics offers a taxonomy that moves from the individual outward to family, community, and society. The leader who grasps the full range of damage can speak with the urgency and specificity the subject demands.

5.1 Spiritual Harm

Grudem treats spiritual harm as primary, and rightly. The desires pornography arouses are, on Jesus’ verdict, adultery in the heart (Matt. 5:28), and the awareness of that sin opens a distance from God: “If I had cherished iniquity in my heart, the Lord would not have listened” (Ps. 66:18). John confirms that a guilty conscience hinders prayer (1 John 3:21–22).[45] The cumulative cost of sustained consumption is not measured in discrete incidents but in a slowly deadening conscience, an atrophying prayer life, and a widening gap between the soul and God.

Grudem adds that pornography is spiritually deceptive, because its initial pull can never satisfy and never yields the deep joy that comes only in fellowship with God. David knew the contrast: “In your presence there is fullness of joy; at your right hand are pleasures forevermore” (Ps. 16:11). Because it cannot give lasting joy, Grudem writes, pornography “can snare and entrap people into pursuing more and more vile materials, until it destroys their lives.”[46]

Naselli sharpens the same insight through Hebrews 11, where Moses refuses “the fleeting pleasures of sin.” Sin can be pleasurable, for a moment, and then the pleasure is gone, leaving emptiness and a craving for more. Indulging in pornography, Naselli writes, is like eating a sugar-coated poison pill; it may quiet the urge short-term, but it steals the joy it promises.[47] The pleasures of God do not behave that way.

5.2 Harm to Marriages

Grudem’s account of marital harm is detailed and urgent. A man who uses pornography robs his wife of affection that belongs to her, turning his heart away from her and from the desire for her, which corrodes the sexual relationship in the marriage and lays down memories that interfere with it for years.[48]

The behavioral signs Grudem lists are useful to pastors and spouses: waning interest in marital sex, anger when the subject is raised, emotional distance, secrecy, excessive internet use, withdrawal, and rising criticism of the wife’s appearance. Beyond the signs, a wife often senses something impure in her husband before she has discovered a single fact. Grudem cites research reported by the American Sociological Association indicating that once one spouse begins using pornography, the probability of divorce rises measurably.[49]

Cutrer adds a practical warning. Many single men suppose that marriage will solve the problem, and the assumption proves catastrophic. Marital intimacy was never designed to compete with a sinful habit, and the unaddressed habit resurfaces.[50] The man who carries an addiction across the threshold carries it into the marriage, and his wife will feel the weight of something she neither caused nor can cure.

5.3 Distorted Views of Sex and Society

Sociological research has documented the wider distortions. Grudem draws on psychologist Patrick Fagan, whose summary he quotes: pornography “hurts adults, children, couples, families, and society.” Among adolescents it impedes the development of a healthy sexuality; among adults it warps sexual attitudes and the perception of social reality; in families it drives dissatisfaction, infidelity, separation, and divorce.[51]

Fagan’s findings on adolescents are especially alarming. Exposure to explicit material increases uncertainty about sexuality and favorable attitudes toward sex outside marriage; heavy consumption correlates with intercourse among non-romantic friends and with the broader hook-up culture. Pornography also distorts the picture of reality, inflating estimates of how sexually active the general population is and how common practices such as group sex and sadomasochism are, and cultivating three core beliefs: that sex is recreational, that men are driven by sex, and that women are sexual commodities.

5.4 The Possibility of Addiction

Drawing again on Fagan, Grudem documents the addictive potential in sober detail. Pornography and cybersex are highly habit-forming and can produce sexually compulsive behavior; in one survey more than ninety percent of therapists believed a person could become addicted to cybersex. Victor Cline’s clinical work identifies a four-step progression: addiction, in which pornography supplies a powerful stimulant followed by release; escalation, in which the user requires more explicit and deviant material over time; desensitization, in which what once seemed “gross, shocking and disturbing” becomes common and acceptable; and acting out, in which the user enacts what he has viewed.[52]

Grudem also cites Alan Sears, former director of the Attorney General’s Commission on Pornography, who calls pornography “the true hate literature of our age,” for its hatred and exploitation of the human person, “reducing human beings to valueless commodities to be ogled at and disposed of.”[53] The sexual union of marriage is meant by the Creator as an act of supreme love and self-giving. Secular sexuality, by contrast, organizes itself around the self rather than the good of the other.

5.5 Harm to Women and Communities

Grudem’s treatment of communities includes land-use studies linking adult businesses to elevated rates of sex offenses, property crime, and violent crime in the surrounding area. Mary Anne Layden, director of education for the University of Pennsylvania Health System, supplies a striking clinical observation: across thirteen years of treating both victims and perpetrators of sexual violence, she had “not treated a single case of sexual violence that did not involve pornography.”[54] The link between pornographic habituation and the dehumanization that sexual violence requires is not incidental. It is structural.

5.6 The Participation in Sex Slavery

The harm does not stop at the user, his marriage, or his neighborhood. It reaches the women and children inside the industry, and here Naselli presses the argument the church most often omits. When a man indulges in pornography, he feeds a system, and the system runs on the bodies of the trafficked. Naselli’s image is blunt: pornography is to sex slavery what gasoline is to an engine.[55]

He builds the case on David Platt, who lays out the connection between consumption and trafficking. Platt argues that the research consistently links the production of pornography to sex trafficking, that federal legislation and industry participants alike have acknowledged the link, and that by one accounting at least a third of those trafficked for sex are used in the production of pornography. The cycle is self-reinforcing: the more pornography is consumed, the greater the appetite for paid sex, and the greater that appetite, the larger the demand that traffickers exist to supply. Platt’s conclusion is severe. As long as the same hands that write a red X to protest slavery are clicking through pornographic sites, he writes, “we are frauds to the core.”[56]

The empirical literature gathered by Donna Rice Hughes points the same direction. Surveying the research of Laura Lederer, Hughes notes four links between pornography and the trade: some pornography is itself trafficking, produced through force or coercion; some is a record of exploitation made by traffickers themselves; some is used to train and groom victims for prostitution; and some functions to rationalize exploitation for those who consume it.[57] The demand side and the supply side are not separable markets. They are one market with two faces.

Naselli’s pastoral application lands with deliberate force. He asks the reader to feel toward pornography what he would feel watching a child be violated, and quotes a line he means to be unforgettable: “If you saw a woman being gang raped in a back alley, would you stop and masturbate?”[58] The point is not rhetorical excess. It is that the screen does not insulate the viewer from the act. Honorable men protect women and children. They do not finance their abuse from the privacy of a browser.

6. Pastoral Response: From Ethics to Ministry

Lambert identifies the church’s most urgent deficiency not as ethical analysis but as pastoral skill. Christians agree that pornography is wrong. What has proven hard is knowing how to help the man caught in it. The strongest resources describe the problem well and then stop short of the practical wisdom that changes people.[59] When the church tells a man only what he already knows, adding to his conviction without helping him carry it, it compounds his despair.

6.1 The Two Movements of Romans 13

Lambert anchors his strategy in Romans 13:11–14:[60]

Besides this you know the time, that the hour has come for you to wake from sleep. For salvation is nearer to us now than when we first believed. The night is far gone; the day is at hand. So then let us cast off the works of darkness and put on the armor of light. Let us walk properly as in the daytime, not in orgies and drunkenness, not in sexual immorality and sensuality, not in quarreling and jealousy. But put on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make no provision for the flesh, to gratify its desires.

6.1.1 A Message to Be Believed

Paul’s first move is indicative, not imperative. Christians already live in the daylight of salvation. For a man consumed by pornography, freedom feels impossible, and so the first pastoral obligation is not a command but a summons to believe the radical truth that in Christ he is already set free. That belief does not abolish the struggle. It reframes it. The fight is not to win a freedom he lacks but to inhabit a freedom Christ has already secured.

6.1.2 A Message to Be Obeyed

On the indicative Paul builds the imperative: make no provision for the flesh. Lambert notes the command has a negative and a positive pole.[61] Negatively, a man identifies the desires driving his consumption and cuts off every opportunity to gratify them. This is specific, not generic. How does he reach pornography? The computer, the phone? Software, passwords, confession to those whose devices he has used without their knowledge, these are part of what Paul means by making no provision.

6.2 Removing Access and Addressing Desire

Removing access will prove fruitless unless ministers also help a man deal with the desires examined in section 4, the cravings for novelty, anonymity, brevity, and ease.[62] By grace, a man driven by the desire for novelty can grow to love faithful, committed sex. The goal is not behavioral compliance but the renovation of desire.

Grudem’s practical counsel runs alongside. Filters, monitoring software, shared passwords, and the placement of devices in visible rooms give structural support to the fight; but such measures serve an inward battle and never resolve it.[63] The inward work is slower and harder and belongs to Word, prayer, and community.

6.3 The Positive Pole: Beholding Christ

The positive imperative of Romans 13:14, “put on the Lord Jesus Christ,” is for Lambert the center of the matter. The fight for purity is not finally a fight to avoid looking at pornography. It is a fight, in his words, “to be riveted, captivated, and stunned by the Lord Jesus Christ.”[64] He cites Helen Lemmel’s 1922 hymn: “Turn your eyes upon Jesus, look full in his wonderful face, and the things of earth will grow strangely dim in the light of his glory and grace.”[65]

When the heart is genuinely captured by the majesty and grace of Christ, there is no room left for what pornography offers. The man learning to meet Christ in the Word, in prayer, and in worship is, in Lambert’s image, pulling pornography up by the roots.[66] The therapeutic model tries to fill an emptiness. The gospel model displaces an idol. The difference is decisive.

6.4 Accountability, Confession, and the Body of Christ

Cutrer’s churchwide strategy stands on three legs: trained leaders, taught congregations, and individualized soul care.[67] The first step for the man in the grip of pornography is relentless honesty with a mature believer. No one wins this in isolation. Direct accountability to a same-sex mentor, with regular and intentional contact, is not an optional supplement to the strategy but a constitutive part of it, and the mentor has to stay in the man’s life for the duration. Accountability can change behavior; only genuine repentance changes the heart.[68]

Cutrer’s recommendation of fasting is striking precisely because it is indirect. Fasting from food builds the muscle of self-denial where the stakes are lower, training a man to say no to appetite in a setting that carries no immediate sexual temptation. Practiced against hunger, that self-control becomes available when the stronger temptation presses.[69]

6.5 The Marital Dimension

Care for the pornography-addicted man cannot ignore his wife. Cutrer notes that most wives of sexually addicted husbands carry a crushing guilt, suspecting that some insufficiency in them drove the husband away.[70] The counselor has to address the marriage directly, the anger, the betrayal, the disgust, and help the wife see that the problem lies in her husband’s disordered desire, not in her. The blunt warning belongs here too, for the single man who imagines marriage will fix him: marital intimacy was never built to compete with a sinful habit.

On the constructive side, the Puritan Richard Baxter offered married men counsel that still applies to a marriage scarred by past failure. Stir up what is best in your wife, he advised, and do not stir up what is worst; there is some uncleanness in the best of people, and a husband who keeps stirring the filth should not be surprised at the stench. Draw out instead what is good and lovely in her, and even a faulty wife will appear more amiable.[71] The point reaches the recovering man directly. The renovation of desire is not only a turning from the image but a turning toward the real woman God has given him.

6.6 Spiritual Disciplines and the Rewiring of the Brain

Cutrer notes that rewiring a brain shaped by pornographic images may take months or years to normalize.[72] But there is hope. The disciplines of prayer, Bible reading, meditation, and fasting are not merely pietistic exercises. Neurologically, they are among the means by which new trails are worn into the brain’s forest. The reconfiguration is slow and painful and requires sustained community. It is also possible, and for the regenerate person it is promised.

Piper supplies the theological ground. The discovery of physical dimensions to a spiritual reality does not nullify the spiritual reality. We are not the helpless victims of our eyes and our brains. The neurological evidence of pornography’s enslaving power is not the last word; God has the last word, and the Spirit has the greater power.[73] Grudem agrees that many counseling ministries report real success in helping people gain freedom, which should surprise no one, since Scripture promises that “sin will have no dominion over you, since you are not under law but under grace” (Rom. 6:14).[74]

7. Conclusion

Pornography is a compound pathology. It works at once as a neurological hijacking, a moral catastrophe, and a spiritual idolatry, and it implicates the consumer in a trade that enslaves the trafficked. No single-register analysis captures it, and no single-register response cures it. The neuroscience explains why resolution takes more than willpower; the anatomy of desire explains why it takes more than medication; the theology of idolatry explains why it takes more than therapy. What it takes is the death and resurrection of Christ, applied by the Spirit through Word, prayer, community, accountability, and sustained pastoral care.

The stakes are not modest, and the New Testament does not let us pretend they are. Naselli states the hardest of his seven reasons first: those who habitually and unrepentantly indulge will not inherit the kingdom of God (1 Cor. 6:9–11; Eph. 5:3–6).[75] That warning is not despair but its opposite. The same passage that lists the sins reminds the Corinthians that such were some of you, past tense, but that they were washed and were sanctified and were justified. The warning and the assurance arrive together.

The church that treats pornography as someone else’s problem, a behavioral issue for specialists, a private failing, a subject too embarrassing for the pulpit, will discover that it has been catechizing its members into silence while the habit runs unopposed. Lambert, Mohler, Piper, Cutrer, Naselli, and Grudem agree on the one thing: the church must wake up. Thousands of young Christians are being hooked and making shipwreck of their faith. The urgency is not overstated.

Mohler’s theological aesthetic frames the close. Christianity affirms the unity of the good, the beautiful, and the true in God himself, and pornography is the attempt to sever them, to take beauty without goodness and pleasure without truth.[76] It is a lie about what the body is for, what sex is for, what the other person is for. The church’s counter-proclamation is not only a prohibition but a vision: that in God’s presence there is fullness of joy, that the marriage bed is a gift, that the body is for the Lord, and that the resurrection is the final answer to everything pornography promises and cannot deliver.

Grace is more wonderful than pornography is terrible. Where sin increased, grace abounded all the more (Rom. 5:20). The practical strategies these writers have developed are not substitutes for grace; they are the means by which grace is applied to specific sins in specific people.[77] The grace of Jesus gives more than an explanation of what drives a man to pornography. It gives the power to turn his eyes upon Jesus instead. That is the promise the church has been commissioned to deliver, and it is enough.

Bibliography and Suggested Reading

Alcorn, Randy. The Purity Principle. Sisters, OR: Multnomah, 2003.

———. Sexual Temptation: Establishing Guardrails and Winning the Battle. 3rd ed. Sandy, OR: Eternal Perspective Ministries, 2011.

Arterburn, Stephen, and Fred Stoeker. Every Man’s Battle: Winning the War on Sexual Temptation One Victory at a Time. Edited by Mike Yorkey. Colorado Springs: WaterBrook, 2000.

Beougher, Timothy. “The Puritan View of Marriage: The Nature of the Husband/Wife Relationship in Puritan England as Taught and Experienced by a Representative Puritan Pastor, Richard Baxter.” Trinity Journal 10, no. 2 (Fall 1989): 131–60.

Chester, Tim. Closing the Window: Steps to Living Porn Free. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2010.

Court, J. H. “Pornography.” In New Dictionary of Christian Ethics and Pastoral Theology, edited by David J. Atkinson and David H. Field, 675–77. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1995.

Cutrer, William R. “Family Physician: The Poison of Pornography.” Journal of Discipleship and Family Ministry 3, no. 2 (Spring 2013): 66–70.

Dufault-Hunter, Erin. “Pornography.” In Dictionary of Scripture and Ethics, edited by Joel B. Green, 607–8. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2011.

Dunnington, Kent. Addiction and Virtue: Beyond the Models of Disease and Choice. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2011.

Eberstadt, Mary, and Mary Anne Layden. The Social Costs of Pornography: A Statement of Findings and Recommendations. Princeton, NJ: Witherspoon Institute, 2010.

Everett, Glen D. “Pornography.” In Wycliffe Dictionary of Christian Ethics, edited by Carl F. H. Henry, 517–18. 1973. Reprint, Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2000.

Fagan, Patrick F. “The Effects of Pornography on Individuals, Marriages, Families, and Communities.” Washington, DC: Family Research Council, n.d.

Frame, John M. The Doctrine of the Christian Life: A Theology of Lordship. Phillipsburg, NJ: P&R, 2008.

Geisler, Norman L. Christian Ethics: Contemporary Issues and Options. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2010.

Grudem, Wayne. Christian Ethics: Living a Life That Is Pleasing to God. Updated ed. Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2024.

Hall, Laurie. An Affair of the Mind: One Woman’s Courageous Battle to Salvage Her Family from the Devastation of Pornography. Colorado Springs: Focus on the Family, 1996.

Harris, Joshua. Sex Is Not the Problem (Lust Is): Sexual Purity in a Lust-Saturated World. Sisters, OR: Multnomah, 2003.

Hart, Archibald D. The Sexual Man: Masculinity without Guilt. Dallas: Thomas Nelson, 1995.

Hughes, Donna Rice. “The Internet Pornography Pandemic: ‘The Largest Unregulated Social Experiment in Human History.’” Christian Apologetics Journal 12, no. 1 (Spring 2014): 13–45.

Kaiser, Walter C., Jr. What Does the Lord Require? A Guide for Preaching and Teaching Biblical Ethics. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2009.

Kastleman, Mark B. The Drug of the New Millennium: The Science of How Internet Pornography Radically Alters the Human Brain and Body. Orem, UT: Granite, 2001.

Keller, Timothy. Counterfeit Gods: The Empty Promises of Money, Sex, and Power, and the Only Hope That Matters. New York: Dutton, 2009.

Lambert, Heath. Finally Free: Fighting for Purity with the Power of Grace. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2013.

———. “The Problem of Pornography: Why It’s Wrong and How to Help.” Journal for Biblical Manhood and Womanhood 17, no. 2 (Fall 2012): 11–16.

McLawhorn, Richard. Summary of the Final Report of the Attorney General’s Commission on Pornography. Cincinnati: National Coalition Against Pornography, 1986.

McQuilkin, Robertson, and Paul Copan. An Introduction to Biblical Ethics: Walking in the Way of Wisdom. 3rd ed. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2014.

Mohler, R. Albert, Jr. “Equipping the Generations: How Pornography Works.” Journal of Discipleship and Family Ministry 4, no. 1 (Fall 2013): 74–75.

———. “Fifty Shades of Shame: The Evolution of Pornography.” Journal of Discipleship and Family Ministry 5, no. 1 (Fall 2015): 125–28.

Naselli, Andrew David. “Seven Reasons You Should Not Indulge in Pornography.” Themelios 41, no. 3 (2016): 473–83.

———. “When You Indulge in Pornography, You Participate in Sex Slavery.” Journal for Biblical Manhood and Womanhood 20, no. 2 (2015): 23–29.

Piper, John. “Equipping the Generations: Pornography—The New Narcotic.” Journal of Discipleship and Family Ministry 4, no. 1 (Fall 2013): 76–77.

———. “Faith in Future Grace vs. Lust.” In Future Grace: The Purifying Power of the Promises of God, 2nd ed., 329–38. Colorado Springs: Multnomah, 2012.

Plantinga, Cornelius, Jr. Not the Way It’s Supposed to Be: A Breviary of Sin. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1995.

Platt, David. “A War on Women: The Gospel and Sex Slavery.” In Counter Culture: Following Christ in an Anti-Christian Age, rev. and updated ed., 109–32. Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale Momentum, 2017.

Rea, Michael C. “What Is Pornography?” Noûs 35, no. 1 (2001): 118–45.

Struthers, William M. Wired for Intimacy: How Pornography Hijacks the Male Brain. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2009.

Tambling, Jeremy. On Reading the Will: Law and Desire in Literature and Music. Portland, OR: Sussex Academic Press, 2012.

Tripp, Paul David. Sex and Money: Pleasures That Leave You Empty and Grace That Satisfies. Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2013.

White, John. Eros Defiled: The Christian and Sexual Sin. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1977.

---

[1] Heath Lambert, “The Problem of Pornography: Why It’s Wrong and How to Help,” Journal for Biblical Manhood and Womanhood 17, no. 2 (Fall 2012): 11.

[2] Andrew David Naselli, “Seven Reasons You Should Not Indulge in Pornography,” Themelios 41, no. 3 (2016): 473.

[3] Michael C. Rea, “What Is Pornography?” Noûs 35, no. 1 (2001): 118–19. Rea argues that the term resists a tidy real definition and is best analyzed in terms of how material is reasonably expected to be used or treated by its intended audience.

[4] J. H. Court, “Pornography,” in New Dictionary of Christian Ethics and Pastoral Theology, ed. David J. Atkinson and David H. Field (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1995), 675–77.

[5] R. Albert Mohler Jr., “Equipping the Generations: How Pornography Works,” Journal of Discipleship and Family Ministry 4, no. 1 (Fall 2013): 74.

[6] William R. Cutrer, “Family Physician: The Poison of Pornography,” Journal of Discipleship and Family Ministry 3, no. 2 (Spring 2013): 66.

[7] John Piper, “Equipping the Generations: Pornography—The New Narcotic,” Journal of Discipleship and Family Ministry 4, no. 1 (Fall 2013): 76.

[8] R. Albert Mohler Jr., “Fifty Shades of Shame: The Evolution of Pornography,” Journal of Discipleship and Family Ministry 5, no. 1 (Fall 2015): 125.

[9] Mohler, “Fifty Shades of Shame,” 126–27.

[10] Mohler, “Fifty Shades of Shame,” 125–26.

[11] Cutrer, “Poison of Pornography,” 66.

[12] Lambert, “Problem of Pornography,” 15.

[13] Wayne Grudem, Christian Ethics: Living a Life That Is Pleasing to God, updated ed. (Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2024), 787–88.

[14] Grudem, Christian Ethics, 788.

[15] Grudem, Christian Ethics, 788n1, observing that the construction pros + infinitive (pros to epithymēsai autēn) marks the purpose of the looking.

[16] Grudem, Christian Ethics, 795–96 (objections and rationalizations).

[17] Naselli, “Seven Reasons,” 475–76. The argument of 1 Corinthians 6 supplies one of Naselli’s seven motivations: indulging in pornography fails to glorify God with the body.

[18] Naselli, “Seven Reasons,” 476.

[19] William M. Struthers, Wired for Intimacy: How Pornography Hijacks the Male Brain (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2009), quoted in Mohler, “How Pornography Works,” 74.

[20] Struthers, Wired for Intimacy, quoted in Mohler, “How Pornography Works,” 75.

[21] Piper, “Pornography—The New Narcotic,” 76, summarizing Morgan Bennett’s account of pornography as a “polydrug.”

[22] Piper, “Pornography—The New Narcotic,” 77.

[23] Piper, “Pornography—The New Narcotic,” 76–77.

[24] Struthers, Wired for Intimacy, quoted in Cutrer, “Poison of Pornography,” 67.

[25] Cutrer, “Poison of Pornography,” 68.

[26] Mohler, “How Pornography Works,” 75.

[27] Cornelius Plantinga Jr., Not the Way It’s Supposed to Be: A Breviary of Sin (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1995), 19.

[28] Kent Dunnington, Addiction and Virtue: Beyond the Models of Disease and Choice (Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2011), 62, 118.

[29] Dunnington, Addiction and Virtue, 148.

[30] Michael John Cusick, Surfing for God: Discovering the Divine Desire Beneath Sexual Struggle (Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 2012), 30–31, 76, 157, 162, cited in Lambert, “Problem of Pornography,” 12.

[31] Lambert, “Problem of Pornography,” 12.

[32] Lambert, “Problem of Pornography,” 12–13.

[33] Lambert, “Problem of Pornography,” 13.

[34] Lambert, “Problem of Pornography,” 13.

[35] Lambert, “Problem of Pornography,” 13.

[36] Lambert, “Problem of Pornography,” 13.

[37] Lambert, “Problem of Pornography,” 13.

[38] Lambert, “Problem of Pornography,” 13–14.

[39] Lambert, “Problem of Pornography,” 14.

[40] Lambert, “Problem of Pornography,” 14.

[41] Lambert, “Problem of Pornography,” 14.

[42] Cutrer, “Poison of Pornography,” 67.

[43] Cutrer, “Poison of Pornography,” 67–68; the embedded quotations are from Struthers, Wired for Intimacy.

[44] Mohler, “Fifty Shades of Shame,” 126.

[45] Grudem, Christian Ethics, 789.

[46] Grudem, Christian Ethics, 790.

[47] Naselli, “Seven Reasons,” 477, drawing on Hebrews 11:24–26.

[48] Grudem, Christian Ethics, 790.

[49] Grudem, Christian Ethics, 790, citing a study reported by the American Sociological Association (2016).

[50] Cutrer, “Poison of Pornography,” 68.

[51] Grudem, Christian Ethics, 790–92, quoting Patrick F. Fagan, “The Effects of Pornography on Individuals, Marriages, Families, and Communities,” 3, 5–6, 12–13.

[52] Grudem, Christian Ethics, 792–93, citing Victor B. Cline, “Pornography’s Effects on Adults and Children,” 3–5.

[53] Alan Sears, “Pornography: The Degrading Behemoth (Part 1),” Catholic Online, July 29, 2004, quoted in Grudem, Christian Ethics, 794.

[54] Mary Anne Layden, quoted in Haven Bradford Gow, “Child Sex Abuse: America’s Dirty Secret” (March 2000), cited in Grudem, Christian Ethics, 793–94.

[55] Naselli, “Seven Reasons,” 481; see further Andrew David Naselli, “When You Indulge in Pornography, You Participate in Sex Slavery,” Journal for Biblical Manhood and Womanhood 20, no. 2 (2015): 23–29.

[56] David Platt, Counter Culture (Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale, 2015), 120–22, quoted in Naselli, “Seven Reasons,” 480–81.

[57] Donna Rice Hughes, “The Internet Pornography Pandemic: ‘The Largest Unregulated Social Experiment in Human History,’” Christian Apologetics Journal 12, no. 1 (Spring 2014): 32–33, summarizing Laura J. Lederer, “Sex Trafficking and Illegal Pornography—Is There a Link?”

[58] Toby J. Sumpter, “The Porn War” (April 30, 2013), quoted in Naselli, “Seven Reasons,” 482.

[59] Lambert, “Problem of Pornography,” 15.

[60] Lambert, “Problem of Pornography,” 15.

[61] Lambert, “Problem of Pornography,” 16.

[62] Lambert, “Problem of Pornography,” 16.

[63] Grudem, Christian Ethics, 797–98.

[64] Lambert, “Problem of Pornography,” 16.

[65] Helen H. Lemmel, “Turn Your Eyes upon Jesus” (1922), quoted in Lambert, “Problem of Pornography,” 16.

[66] Lambert, “Problem of Pornography,” 16.

[67] Cutrer, “Poison of Pornography,” 68–70.

[68] Cutrer, “Poison of Pornography,” 68.

[69] Cutrer, “Poison of Pornography,” 69.

[70] Cutrer, “Poison of Pornography,” 69.

[71] Richard Baxter, quoted in Timothy Beougher, “The Puritan View of Marriage: The Nature of the Husband/Wife Relationship in Puritan England as Taught and Experienced by a Representative Puritan Pastor, Richard Baxter,” Trinity Journal 10, no. 2 (Fall 1989): 158.

[72] Cutrer, “Poison of Pornography,” 68.

[73] Piper, “Pornography—The New Narcotic,” 77.

[74] Grudem, Christian Ethics, 798.

[75] Naselli, “Seven Reasons,” 473–74, on 1 Corinthians 6:9–11 and Ephesians 5:3–6.

[76] Mohler, “Fifty Shades of Shame,” 126–28.

[77] Lambert, “Problem of Pornography,” 16.

** ** ** **

Nearly three decades of incarceration have not slowed the work. If anything, they have sharpened it. The writing you find here, whether a polemical essay on papal primacy, a chapter in systematic theology, or a careful treatment of some contested doctrine, represents focused labor done under unusual constraints and with genuine love for the church and her Lord.

If something I have written clarified a doctrine you were wrestling with, gave you material you could put in front of your congregation or a student, or simply saved you hours of digging through sources you did not have time to track down yourself, I am grateful. That is exactly what the work is for.

Supporting it is simple. A contribution through the link below frees up the time and resources that serious, Scripture-anchored scholarship requires. There is no institution behind this, no salary, no research budget. Just the work, and people like you who believe it matters.

Thank you for reading. Thank you for sharing what has helped you. And if you are in a position to give, thank you for that too.

https://buymeacoffee.com/JNeilDaniels